| |
Puff Daddies
 |
 |
 |
 |
| >
Inveterate smoker Alfred Blalock, world-famous
heart surgeon of the 1940s and 1950s. |
|
|
Doctors, along with everyone else, were hooked
on cigarettes for most of the last century. At Johns
Hopkins, that made going smoke-free a lot more cumbersome.
It’s a Saturday morning in the early 1950s, and
Hurd Hall is packed with house staff, faculty and attending
physicians. Grand Rounds is under way. In the front
of the room, an Osler head nurse, crisp in her starched
uniform, stands at the side of a patient in a beautifully
made bed. Next to her is the resident who is presenting
the patient to chief A. McGehee Harvey. As Harvey finishes
his own examination, several young doctors push the
bed out into the hallway.
What happened next remains fixed in the memory of Richard
S. Ross, dean emeritus of the School of Medicine, who
was an assistant resident at the time—tap, tap,
tap. “Smoking was not permitted while patients
were in the room,” Ross says, “but during
the discussion of the last case, you could see the addicts
take out their cigarettes and tap them on a hard surface
to get them ready. As soon as the last patient was wheeled
to the door, there would be a clicking of cigarette
lighters and flashes of fire from lighters and matches.
A few minutes later, the room would go dark and the
slide projector, used to discuss the intricacies of
the cases, would come on. All around, you could see
plumes of smoke and little red spots that got brighter
as smokers took their drags.”
Right up until the end of the 20th century, most Americans
smoked. Even doctors. Especially doctors. One famous
cigarette ad that ran regularly throughout the 1940s
and 1950s says it all. In a version that appeared on
the back cover of Life magazine in 1946, the hero, a
pajama-clad family doctor awakened by a late-night phone
call, tells his patient, “I’ll be right
over.” The stirring text reads: “When there’s
a job to do, he does it. A few winks of sleep …
a few puffs of a cigarette … and he’s back
at that job again.” The headline: “More
doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette!”
A survey of 113,597 doctors named Camel as their preferred
brand, the ad notes.
Ross was one of those smokers (though not of Camels).
He went on to become a cardiologist, and later head
of the American Heart Association. One of the most famous
medical portraits ever is a stunning, black-and-white
photograph by the internationally renowned Canadian
photographer Yousef Karsh of the great Hopkins surgeon
Alfred Blalock. Particularly riveting is the smoke spiraling
from the cigarette perched in Blalock’s right
hand. But Blalock was a heart surgeon! How could he
have smoked when even in the 1950s, the risks of smoking
were becoming well known?
“Everybody smoked in those days,” Ross
says. “There is a picture of me leaving our wedding
reception in 1950, with a cigarette in my mouth.”
He remembers discussing cases during his residency with
his friend Gordon Walker, an intern, who’d hold
out a pack of cigarettes and ask, “Want a coffin
nail?” And yet, says Ross, “he continued
to smoke, as did I.”
Smoking calmed you, the notion went. It helped relieve
the tension in a stressful job. Medical ethicist Peter
Dans, M.D., the author of a book on doctors in the movies,
cites a line from the film Society Doctor, in which
an OR nurse tells intern Robert Taylor, “There’s
nothing like a cigarette before a tonsillectomy—or,
for that matter, after a tonsillectomy.”
By the late 1960s, though, medical students were urging
Hopkins to move with the times and get rid of the cigarette
machines in the Hospital, School of Medicine and School
of Public Health. In February 1969, 13 members of the
Medical Student Society, led by Franklin Adkinson, approved
Resolution 3A. A formal document with lots of whereas-es,
it cited the fifth anniversary of the publication of
the surgeon general’s report on smoking and health,
and asked that all cigarette vending machines be removed
and replaced with printed signs explaining the health
effects of smoking.
In March, Adkinson and the council took their case
to the Advisory Board of the Medical Faculty. The board
approved the move, against the wishes of Dean David
Rogers, a heavy smoker. In a letter to Adkinson, dated
May 1, 1969, Rogers confessed, “I personally voted
against this measure but am pleased to indicate that
I was soundly defeated by my advisory board. How’s
that for reasonable democracy?”
In April, Hospital President Russell Nelson seemed
to support the students’ resolution, but, according
to a story in the Baltimore News-American, argued against
it to the Hospital’s board of trustees, and it was
defeated. The result: The School of Medicine got rid of
its three cigarette machines. The Hospital and School
of Public Health kept theirs.
Ross quit smoking in 1967, but a few of his colleagues
had a harder time. He remembers two or three smoke-filled
meetings a week during his deanship with University
President Steven Muller and Hospital President Bob Heyssel,
who both smoked. “I kept a small ashtray in my
office for guests who smoked. On at least one occasion,
13 butts were dumped from the ashtray at the end of
the meeting.”
Ed Halle, senior vice president emeritus of the Hospital,
logged untold hours at these meetings. “Poor Dick
Ross,” he says. “He would just be covered
with smoke.” Halle kept an ashtray for Heyssel
in his own office, as well. “There would be one
cigarette butt for every 15 minutes,” he says.
“You could set a clock by it.”
It took until July 1988 for the Hospital to go smoke-free.
Four months later, Ross, who was dean at the time, announced
that on March 1, 1989, the School of Medicine would
follow its lead. By then, of course, the health risks
of cigarettes were imprinted on the nation, and smoking
had become taboo in polite society. Many faculty and
house staff had either kicked the habit or never even
started.
Today, physicians-in-training often are aghast to learn
that so many doctors once smoked. But Peter Dans is
more philosophical. “We tend to want to go back
in time and chastise people for not behaving as we now
know they should have behaved,” he says. “Our
payback is that people will probably do the same thing
to us 20 or 30 years from now about something else.”
|
|