Avi Kupfer stares at his computer monitor, intently
watching a movie of immune cells mingling with each
other. He points to one particular cell, which glows
with a soft green. “This is a CD4 T-cell,” he
says. “They are like the head housekeepers
of the immune system. They go around and probe the
other cells in our body to make sure everyone who’s
there belongs in the neighborhood.”
This ability to properly distinguish intruders and
then destroy them is vitally important. Without CD4
cells doing their thing, disease-causing bacteria
or malignant tumor cells can spread like wildfire.
On the other hand, if these cells get too aggressive,
they start ravaging our own body, leading to autoimmune
disease. The attacks can occur anywhere, from our
joints (rheumatoid arthritis) to our spinal cord
(multiple sclerosis) or even multiple tissues (lupus).
Nearly one fifth of the world’s population
suffers with one of the 18 known autoimmune conditions. “So
this,” says Kupfer, “is not a minor concern.”
While what happens inside these T-cells is pretty
well defined, Kupfer says, the question of what happens
between the cells is not. Knowing that the immune
system is always just one mixed-up message from disaster,
Kupfer is on a quest to get ever better pictures
of this intercellular communication process in action.
A little more than a decade ago, Kupfer radically
changed the prevailing view of how immune cells “talk” when
he provided the first visual evidence showing that
CD4 cells communicate with each other via what he
came to dub immune “synapses.” Now, in
his third year at Johns Hopkins, as co-director of
the Immunology Program at the Institute for Cell
Engineering, Kupfer is building rapidly on that work.
He’s using the latest in 4-D imaging technology
to offer unparalleled insights into just how the
immune synapse functions.
The potential for healing human suffering is vast:
Beyond finding better ways to prevent autoimmune
disease, understanding how the synapse works could
lead to improved control over immune suppression. “For
example, CD4 cells might be reconfigured so they
won’t turn on following a transplant operation,” Kupfer
says excitedly. “We could help prevent organ
rejection without the use of any drugs.”
*****
Born and educated in Israel, Avi Kupfer still recalls
the quiet elation he felt that afternoon back in
1995 when he stood before an auditorium of his colleagues
at a meeting in Cold Spring Harbor. They sat mesmerized
as he flashed before them the first 3-D microscopical
images of the immune synapse in action.
“The term immunological synapse had become
a mantra; this was the secret we were trying to figure
out,” recalls Michael Dustin, a colleague of
Kupfer’s who studies T-cell activation at NYU’s
Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine. “Not
long afterwards I saw Avi’s images in Charles
Janeway’s immunology book; this might be the
only result to make it into the ‘textbooks’ before
it appeared in a peer-reviewed journal.”
To most scientists, the word synapse conjures up
images of the body’s nervous system. Synapses
are formed in the gaps between two nerve cells or
a nerve cell and its action target, such as a muscle
cell. These adhesive junctions ensure quick and efficient
transfer of every message traveling through the neural
network. Without them, these messages might take
wayward detours or end up getting scrambled like
a game of telephone.
The notion of an immune synapse was first suggested
in 1984 by National Institutes of Health researcher
Michael Norcross. He also suggested that the immune
and nervous systems may both have arisen from the
same ancestral signaling pathway. Over the next decade,
the idea began to pick up steam. After all, both
systems contain specialized cell types that communicate
with each other using a wide array of chemical signals,
both rely on a method of memory storage and retrieval
in order to function well, and both require cell-to-cell
contact to acquire information.
Plus, recalls Kupfer, there was more: “On
any given CD4, the exact same surface receptor can
produce wildly different end results depending on
which signal hits it,” he notes. “It
could be a productive outcome like rapid T-cell division,
or it could be the exact opposite: cell death. I,
and others, thought, There must be some unique events
on the surface that tell immune cells what to do.”
But how to watch those events unfold? To do so,
Kupfer built on pioneering work in immunofluorescence
he’d done as a postdoc in the lab of Jonathan
Singer at the University of California, San Diego.
Under normal viewing, cells are fairly transparent.
But Singer had been using antibodies to coat proteins
in cells to bring out more miscroscopic detail and
better distinguish internal components.
Kupfer first used immunofluorescence to observe
the movement of a fibroblast, a cell that travels
to sites of injury to help repair damaged connective
tissue. He’d found that as cells approached
the wound site, two internal structures—the
Golgi and microtubules—in each fibroblast rotated
like the hands of a clock to both point toward the
edge of the wound.
Kupfer understood the significance right away. The
Golgi acts like a processing plant, sorting and packaging
all the proteins that need to go to the cell surface
or outside of the cell; microtubules, among other
roles, serve as molecular conveyor belts that help
transport these packaged proteins to their destination.
Together, this implied that the fibroblasts had designed
a directed flow of traffic to maximize the delivery
of their repair proteins.
Intrigued, Kupfer began adapting immunofluorescence
toward immune cells, largely unheard of at the time. “Immunology
was studied as more of a systems process,” says
Kupfer. “Researchers would look at how all
the different immune cells worked together to respond
to infection. Not many set their sights at the level
of a single cell.”
Collaborating with Gunther Dennert, a researcher
at the nearby Salk Institute, he took on T-cells—shock
troops that destroy virus- or bacteria- infected
cells by hitting them with a potent barrage of toxins—and
found the same clockwork shifting of the Golgi and
microtubules shortly after they made contact with
their target cells.
Dennert recalls the finding as “a giant step
forward.”
Kupfer had been bitten by the imaging bug and now,
with the internal motions of the immune cell visualized,
he was ready to look externally—to figure out
how two immune cells interact with each other. Because
of the limited area on the surface, though, the flat,
two-dimensional cell images of the past wouldn’t
suffice. Kupfer had to go 3-D.
It was a daunting task, one that required the young
scientist, newly installed in his own lab at the
national Jewish Medical and Research Center in Denver,
to design and build a 3-D imaging machine from scratch.
Kupfer’s first pictures of CD4 surface activity,
captured in 1995, vindicated the labor and proffered
an unexpected bonus. He had correctly guessed that
surface proteins would converge on the contact area
to further guide the microtubule highway that was
being formed. What he didn’t anticipate was
that different proteins segregated into a well-defined
inner and outer ring, creating a bull’s-eye
pattern that remarkably resembled a cross-section
view of a neuronal synapse!
At first, he says, “I didn’t believe
it. This had to be some kind of experimental artifact.”
Additional studies, though, confirmed that this
organized ring of receptors, structural proteins
and other molecules was indeed a genuine biological
process. When Kupfer slightly altered the receptors
on the target cell so they could still bind CD4 cells
but not activate them, he could not see the distinct
bull’s-eye pattern form. “So this clustering
is critical for turning T-cells on,” he concluded.
He dubbed the two rings the central and peripheral
supramolecular activation clusters (c-SMAC and p-SMAC).
When a colleague then suggested the phrase immune
synapse as a possible nickname, Kupfer was hesitant
at first, he says, “because we really were
looking at it before any signaling took place.” But,
he says with a smile, “I ended up liking it
pretty quickly.”
*****
 |
 |
 |
|
| > The
inner and outer rings of receptors
so critical for turning T-cells "on" |
|
|
On Kupfer’s computer monitor at Hopkins’ Institute
for Cell Engineering, the hazy green CD4 cell touches
a neighboring cell, defining Kupfer’s discovery
in a matter of seconds. As the two cells momentarily
stick together, the diffuse green glow coalesces
and methodically travels to the point of contact,
creating a bright, triangular mass before gradually
dissipating. “That,” he says, “is
an immune synapse in action.”
Action may be an appropriate word, for as this short
demonstration highlights, Kupfer has gone Hollywood.
Previously, his work examined cell events over time
through a series of still images. But in an immune
system that reacts extremely quickly and unfolds
its events in seconds, still imaging can’t
tell the full story.
Smitten by Kupfer’s discoveries and imaging
breakthroughs, ICE Director Steve Desiderio recruited
him to join the Hopkins institute in 2004, giving
him a grand opportunity to pursue his real-time movie
ambitions. With the help of Hopkins experts in fields
such as physics and biomedical engineering, Kupfer
has managed to develop the necessary software and
tools for his new enterprise—multidimensional
live cell imaging. “What our technique essentially
does is capture individual slices of a cell and stack
them together to reconstruct a 3-D image,” he
explains. “We then repeat this process every
second to create our movie.”
With this technique, as well as continued use of
still images and good old molecular biology, Kupfer
is trying to unravel both the functional significance
of the immune synapse and how it is activated. Just
before coming to Hopkins, Kupfer had discovered that
a protein called PKC-theta is a key “master
switch”; it needs to turn on in order for the
other components of the SMAC to organize. Currently,
he is looking for other proteins that regulate synapse
formation.
Beyond that, Kupfer hopes to share his imaging technology
with the rest of Hopkins. He conducts weekly informal
brainstorming sessions with the other professors
in ICE’s immunology department to find new
research avenues, and recently he has initiated a
pilot project that spans multiple researchers and
several Hopkins campuses to thoroughly describe T-cell
communication in health and disease. He hopes to
follow suit with colleagues investigating neuronal
communication as well.
“It’s been a long-standing dream
of mine,” he says, “to expand my imaging
studies to look at our big brother, the neuronal
synapse.”
|